[WikiEN-l] Arbitration Committee members granted checkuser tool

[Tony Sidaway]

On 11/12/05, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/12/05, Brian Haws <brian at bhaws.com> wrote:
> > So your concerns are about the process and not the particular arbitrator involved?
> >
> I didn't say that. We have a tempory apointed arbcom memeber who has
> just failed on an RFB (ok to be fair the "we don't need more
> buracrats" group is large enough to make promotion extreamly tricky).
> They then open a trainreck of a RFC. Under these conditons giving the
> user checkuser is unwise.
>

Why?