[WikiEN-l] Arbitration Committee members granted checkuser tool

[Brian Haws]

geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/12/05, Brian Haws 
wrote:
> So your concerns are about the process and not the particular arbitrator involved?
>
I didn't say that. We have a tempory apointed arbcom memeber who has
just failed on an RFB (ok to be fair the "we don't need more
buracrats" group is large enough to make promotion extreamly tricky).
They then open a trainreck of a RFC. Under these conditons giving the
user checkuser is unwise.

--
geni
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


You feel it'd be unwise because of the possibility Kelly might  abuse it? 

 

It looks like checkuser is going to be added to the bureaucrats positions  "toolkit" so if it's going to be denied to one shouldn't there be some specific reason for doing it?