It is standard to delete recreations which are exact copies or very
near copies of previously deleted material. If that's not the case ask
for undeletion at WP:DRV and tell it was wrongfully deleted as a
recreation, because it is not sufficiently similar.
Mgm
On 11/11/05, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/11/05, Jason Y. Lee <jylee(a)cs.ucr.edu>
wrote:
Since when it has become standard to keep
articles and delete recreations on sight? Whatever happen to the philosophy we had on
allowing an article to be deleted so that someone with the proper knowledge can properly
write the introduction of the article?
--
Jason Y. Lee
AKA AllyUnion
Do you have any evidence that such a philosophy existed in the first
place? If it ever did is suspect it died over the notabilty arguments.
--
geni
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l