[WikiEN-l] Arbitration Committee members granted checkuser tool

[Kelly Martin]

My reason for temporarily withdrawing was because some people had
irrational objections to my selection which seemed to be slowing down
the process of getting anybody selected to supplement David Gerard. 
This is an important problem that has been delayed long enough, and I
was simply willing to "take one for the team" if that would help get
us closer to where we need to be to effectively deal with the problems
that the ArbCom has to deal with on en.

I have grave objections to the process that was followed, and am glad
that the situation has been resolved in accordance with policy without
even more interminable debate and mudslinging.

Kelly

On 11/12/05, Brian Haws <brian at bhaws.com> wrote:
> So your concerns are about the process and not the particular arbitrator involved?
>
> geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:On 11/12/05, Fred Bauder wrote:
> > She "withdrew" cause they were giving her a hard time. The
> > arbitration committee had no reason to withdraw her name.
> >
> > Fred
>
> So arbcom can give people check user rights without their consent.
> That is an ... intersting interpritation of policy.
>
> --
> geni
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>