Can someone tell me why article transclusion is allowed? Or why it is necessary?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_2005 has the same problems as
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2005_English_cricket_season_%2814-25_September…
The issue here is that many editors are running into articles that look like unnecessary
stubs which in fact are transclusions and are completely unaware of it. Why don't we
just disable such transclusions? I do not believe main space (article) transclusions are
necessary and they skew our article count. The number of cricket articles that I found
were a total of 508 articles that happen to be transcluded. I did not know that, nor did
the five other people who nominates similar articles for deletion.
--
Jason Y. Lee
AKA AllyUnion