[WikiEN-l] Arbiter recusal

[Jack Lynch]

I certainly agree, it is statements made by the arbiter, not by the
defendant, which concern me.

"That is not an RfC, it's a rant by a known troublemaker. I see no
reason to participate in such a clearly broken process."
(regarding an RfC initiated by Silverback)
\
Let's check the outrage at the door and discuss this reasonably, ok?
Hyperbolic screaming does not benefit your cause. Kelly Martin (talk)
12:54, 3 November 2005 (UTC)

etc...

Jack (Sam Spade)

On 11/9/05, slimvirgin at gmail.com <slimvirgin at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 11/9/05, Jack Lynch <jack.i.lynch at gmail.com> wrote:
> > There have been recent concerns regarding Kelly Martin, but none so
> > serious as her decision not to recuse herself in the case of an editor
> > whom she has clear animosity toward.
>
> Sam, arbitrators shouldn't have to recuse themselves because an editor
> has tried to draw them into a dispute. If we allowed that, anyone
> could use that tactic against any member of the arbcom they wanted to
> see removed from a case.
>
> Sarah
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>