[WikiEN-l] Totally unscientific investigation...

[Matt R]

--- kosebamse at gmx.net wrote:

> ...regarding the quality of our work:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Kosebamse/Twenty-random-pages_test
> 
> Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose. Kosebamse

I think it's worth making a distinction between the quality of randomly-chosen
articles, and the quality of popular articles. It's hard to know, of course,
but I'd doubt that many of the articles on your list would be getting more than
a handful of readers every month. It's quite possible that the average quality
of Wikipedia articles is staying the same (as people constantly add new stubs /
fancruft etc), while the average "Wikipedia experience" of a reader goes up.

-- Matt

Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Matt_Crypto
Blog: http://cipher-text.blogspot.com


	
	
		
___________________________________________________________ 
Yahoo! Messenger - NEW crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com