[WikiEN-l] RE: Totally unscientific investigation...

Tue Nov 8 16:52:39 UTC 2005

> Message: 11
> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2005 15:57:54 +0000
> From: geni <geniice at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Totally unscientific investigation...
> To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l at wikipedia.org>
> Message-ID:
> 	<f80608430511080757x303f0d80wd05f8d2c08df682 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
> I don't think it is safe to use the word consensus anywhere near the
> encopedist/pro-content disspute (formaly know as the
> deletionist/inclusionist disspute we can't solve it but we can darn
> well rename it).

The issue at hand was *not* deletionism vs. inclusionism. It was
transparency and accessibility vs. opaqueness and inaccessibility.

darin