[WikiEN-l] disputing block: 69.108.172.162, lysdexia

[Autymn D.C.]

Rdsmith4 is misrepresenting and libelling me, and abusing his  
joke-of-a-power again by blocking me again after I had insisted and  
enforced that an article be put in an accurate grammatic mood to fit  
the context, which was not real but ideal.  A short exchange is at  
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk: 
Lysdexia#Grammar_at_Black_Body>.  There, I pointed out that his and  
others' calling my edits only "trolling and disruption" was a fraud, as  
every edit I've ever made to Wikipedia was, in this order: cleanup,  
fact checking, factual disputes, linking, added or alternate  
explanations, expansions.  I checked the block policy page and saw that  
nothing I've done calls for blocking me; in deed, every incident that I  
was in was caused by someone ignorant, irrational, and uncouth  
reporting me to the administrators because I had done something to  
correct or improve a space that /they/ /did not/ /understand/.  Every  
mistake that they claimed I'd made elsewhere was /their/ mistake of  
being an ignorant fool.

Lately I've been bringing out my contentions to the Talk pages before  
editing over the articles, and I hadn't even broken the three-revert  
rule when I was reverting when I found that I was blocked after trying  
to fix some numbers in an Order of magnitude article.  Here's the note  
that's related to my work then:  
<http://egroups.com/group/message/free_energy/20090>.  I was logged in  
then, and found that the block was for a day; but the next time I found  
that my cookies expired, for Yahoo! and Wikipedia, so I had to log in  
again.  But before I did, I saw what happened when I tried with the  
numeric IP.  The same block screen came up, so I logged in and found  
that the block was advanced another day!  I seem to recall this  
happening before, and I didn't deserve it then either.  Note that every  
time this rogue took abusive action against me, he gave no warning  
before so that I could reply instead of doing whatever he was told that  
I shouldn't, against policy, and that he calls my edits of fake value,  
also against policy.  This person has no clue what he's doing, and I  
really need to update my article, as I have a life outside edit or  
dispute wars.

-Aut