Theres no issue of trust in the developers, but
prudence is always prudent : I agree with Geni (in
this case):
simple.wikipedia.org would be a good place
to do it, as would drive a little added interest in
simple. (I dont know if thats a good idea or not).
I thought simple was going to get shut down.
Of course, it could still be used as a guinea pig for new features, but
I didn't realise that there is still interest in reviving it.