-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
steve v wrote:
Reddi has the notion that Iraq is a "sovereign
nation"
(see "suzerainty" ) and writes in a manner which
revolves around this notion.
While WP:CITE is nice and all, the US government and
all the bullshit that comes out of it is a big caustic
problem for those of us who hold a more principled
view of WP:CITE. In short, I need to see Reddi
acknowledge is not sufficiently objective and lets his
POV work its way into the article in various ways. (I
can talk about them if you like). In short, stating
that Iraq is sovereign is a violation of NPOV, though
Reddi claims otherwise.
The weak-by-design Medcom wont intervene because
"Reddi hasn't accepted Mediation," and the
tough-by-design Arbcom doesnt think its an issue until
I start arguing on the talk page, mass revert his
edits, and start unblocking myself.
What to do?
Change "Iraq is a sovereign nation[1]" (where [1] is a US Govt. source)
to "The US Govt. describes Iraq as a sovereign nation[1]" ? Isn't that
NPOV and a /better/ use of WP:CITE?
- --
Alphax | /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred | \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613 | X Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up | / \
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iQEVAwUBQ2qt8rMAAH8MeUlWAQjo5wf/Vko2iJTqmgZDutjcB1lSsvculakAyF/m
8VE2DgR9lgSLU63AqzRwGqZSyMftdzddMyW0Fxkj27ese9dlaJtc0NVM95kvrjqX
jqdMGCsjph65fAXjSMX/BpJddmrsV9Hzp+lUs9OKHDQ3Fvs/YH+upUqmUYcgGcoB
bnbZ9FRXbwsQxCJo25I3Nf+XQ+py8vakIFbJJ9/4+rEhMgFqA5nFvA/O0uZqCkzP
TtYpzv8yAEfOm8SU7fwYSGdzNBz54DNh/xYJUKdzaWRY+AOdCkUyXZ0P5MBLqVm4
FxOValj7ZyQP6py7zrnfYIF9yd3LC1L6sRW7+1TIzW6DSjKZgAax2Q==
=D4G+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----