[WikiEN-l] status correction

[Alphax]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Ben E. wrote:
> I'm not sure if it could be termed a "sucessful RfA". The vote tally
> was *17/29/7/49,
> *which corresponds to (Support/Oppose/Neutral/Remit to ArbCom). The "remit"
> votes were explicitly marked as no vote, but an encouragement to ArbCom to
> retake the case. Therefore, there were a total of 46 countable votes. 17/46
> = 36.96%, which doesn't show a consensus for adminship in my or in any
> bureaucrat's book, I suppose.
> 

Then again, 29/46 = 63.04% which isn't consensus to de-admin either...

If you count all 102 votes:

 - If remit is counted as support, 64.7% support
 - If remit is counted as oppose, 76.5% oppose
 - If remit is counted as neutral, 54.9% neutral

 - If neutral is counted as remit, 54.9% remit
 - If support is counted as remit, 64.7% remit
 - If oppose is counted as remit, 76.5% remit

Bottom line: no consensus.

Of course, you can argue about this as much as you want, but that's what
the numbers say. In this case, I think 100-odd votes is enough to be
able to say "this is a representative sample".

- --
Alphax                      |   /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred   |   \ /     ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613  |    X   Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up    |   / \
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQEVAwUBQ2qW0rMAAH8MeUlWAQjjtQf/YGgYm4AJyN99E8W59LjSYhGqE2w7X0D/
KUTTwf9u0jGlwv/XRiDOf+pW15va2HSPhCsiLaGNIpreEED5+X1TBOIquVLytnj9
FU0HtHKiAHTtQu4quFb8L48KuGw99HXvH7dAbfi/yxXfTPYoaGyC+EOUZA+lkUDv
4oxFI74DFhJvskMn1gzyPl8q424ZeZN9CAVZPKEyohBDOl6S0GtSDI9TIkKR+wC3
ZzF5xKnh+dxbR9347oBZhwHrlwe2CCUfyJ95vcJ9CJ6Ozhf7GI6cnTUnoBvZ1tyu
9ZOaz3MHvqhzTWaJB+VEvGDqkHmPZgkp/7ezk8Nw8+GGVbeRKT8IOw==
=w/oD
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----