On 11/1/05, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
It would depend on the circumstances of the conflict,
wouldn't it? In
cases where there's genuine debate going on, it doesn't make sense to
arbitrarily cut it off at some deadline rather than letting it continue
until a clear decision is reached. If it stalemates then perhaps a
deadline can come into play but it shouldn't be required as a universal
solution.
Stalemate is a subjective judement.
"Conflict" is not inherently bad, it's
part of how disagreements can be
resolved.
Heated conflict is.
--
geni