Go do [[Special:Newpages]] patrol some time.
(Sunday afternoon and
evening US time are "good" for this.) MY GOD, THE AVALANCHES OF CRAP!
I can fully believe we have ~2000 shoot-on-sight new page creations a
day.
I have been looking at this for a while now, something that is clear
is that virtually all (as in ~95%) of the deleted articles (especially
speedies) are from anonymous users, and a lot of which aren't tests,
but plain old vandalism. I really think we need some kind of "votes
for creation" or "approved creation" or something, maybe not soon as
there are still vast quantities of topics we don't cover (see
[[Wikipedia:Wikiproject Missing encyclopedic articles]] for ~150,000
examples), but maybe a in year or so from now I dont think we will
have much choice.
Martin
How about the much simpler approach of restricting page creation to
logged-in users?
This would act as a minimal speedbump which is probably just enough to
discourage many (most?) drive-by junk page creators, whilst still
allowing anons to edit any existing page as freely as before.
This could be applied only to the main article space, thus allowing
anons to create talk pages as before.
This would be similar to the current restriction of image uploads to
logged-in users.
-- Neil