Tony Sidaway wrote:
Quality of source is usually (but not always) POV. We're supposed to be
writing NPOV articles.
A caveat such as "warning: the article relies on population projections
that were proven by events to be grossly in error" is fine and NPOV.
I doubt it would be fine according to the people who happen to believe those
projections are correct. You sentence seems anything but NPOV.
Jay.