No, Fred, he's making a much broader accusation; in fact a series of broad
accusations unsupported by any evidence.
Jay.
From: Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)ctelco.net>
He is referring to my disclosure that I may have briefly encountered Chip
Berlet when I was in the National Lawyers Guild. I did not recuse on that
basis as there was very little if any actual connection between us. I
don't think membership or even active participation in the National
Lawyers Guild forms a basis for recusal as there are a number of reasons
why people join the National Lawyers Guild and participate in it. Other
than involvement in legal work there is absolutely no test for membership.
Successful participation is another story. I soon found out that since I
did not support the Gang of Four I was considered chopped liver.
Fred
On Dec 5, 2005, at 10:57 AM, JAY JG wrote:
Please don't try to re-direct the questions,
Jack, and please don't try
to make them about me. You made insinuations about the Arbitration
Committee, please clarify. I'll repeat the questions:
1. Do you think that the Committee is trying to "purge right wingers"?
2. Do you imagine that there are no "right wingers" on the Committee
itself?
3. Why would you insinuate that Cberlet is any more the "friend and
colleague" of members of the Arbitration Committee than are any of the
other parties to the case?
Jay.