[WikiEN-l] NPOV trainwreck
Fred Bauder
fredbaud at ctelco.net
Sun Dec 4 15:37:38 UTC 2005
Yes, please look at this and give us some feedback. If we have not
explained well enough why we are coming to the decisions we have in
this case, dialogue here would help us explain it better. For a
start, there is no finding that there was any conspiracy. A number of
folks who could loosely be described as "right wing" have engaged in
a number of activities which violate Wikipedia policies and
guidelines. The most serious violations involve Nobs01 who basically
acts like an attack dog. This has little or nothing to do with
anyones political viewpoint, a great deal to do with the targeting of
a valuable Wikipedia editor.
Fred
On Dec 2, 2005, at 2:03 PM, Sam Spade wrote:
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/
> Nobs01_and_others/Proposed_decision
>
> The appointed arbiters don't seem to be working out, place have a look
> at their handiwork. Note the lack of recusals, and near perpetual
> conflicts of interest. Note the political railroading of a handful of
> "rightwingers" on trumped up conspiracy charges. Look at the ability
> of an editor who barely warrants an article to cite himself, and
> enforce his blatantly biased POV w impunity, due to friends in the
> right places. It is a caricature of wikipedia at its worst.
>
> Sam Spade
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list