Charles Matthews wrote:
The second point carries more weight with me.
It's odd that people would
pay money for _less_ information than they could have for free, online.
I just wanted to add that for me, a huge part of the motivation for
what we are doing is people who are not going to be able to get online
reliably for years or decades to come. Paper is still the cheapest
way to distribute content in many parts of the world.
--Jimbo