[WikiEN-l] WP in UK press

[Matthew Larsen]

is it wrong?


On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 19:02:48 +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
<avarab at gmail.com> wrote:
> "It's an 'open source' project - all of its content is in the public
> domain. You can find it at www.wikipedia.org."
> 
> Some quality journalism by the guardian.
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 00:06:16 +0800, John Lee <johnleemk at yahoo.com> wrote:
> > The article in question can be found at:
> > http://observer.guardian.co.uk/business/story/0,6903,1302435,00.html
> >
> > John Lee
> > ([[User:Johnleemk]])
> >
> >
> >
> > Charles Matthews wrote:
> >
> > >A positive article 'Wiki's wacky but it works' in today's London Observer,
> > >Business section, by John Naughton who typically writes on Internet topics.
> > >It takes the line that WP is good at 'self-healing', and is generally better
> > >(more comprehensive) than Britannica Online.
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > WikiEN-l mailing list
> > WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> > http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> >
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> 



-- 
Matthew Larsen
   > mat.larsen at gmail.com
   > 07739 785 249