Daniel Ehrenberg wrote:
In all of the other wikis (except for the ones
modeled
after us), there is no "supreme-dictator-for-life" (as
you put it, perhaps humorsly, in a previous post).
I don't think I ever said that, but if I did, I want to make sure to
dispel the notion that I think such a thing would be appropriate.
I'm the servant of wikipedia, not the master.
On many of the About, FAQ, and similar pages, you
state that
Wikipedia is an anarchy, but that really is not true.
I also don't think Wikipedia is an anarchy.
--Jimbo