Daniel Ehrenberg wrote:
You're missing MY point. From a relistic
perspective,
sexually explicit images are in a different category
than articles describing christianity in Western
culture. I know it is POV, but I think it is
nessessary in a situation like this.
Each category has its own range for what is objectionable. "Sexually
explicit" runs from suggestive almost nudity to goatse.cx. Others might
find the extreme views of "creation science" and "holocaust denial" to
be just as objectionable.
Ec