--- Richard Grevers <lists(a)dramatic.co.nz> wrote:
Hmm ... who
here believes that suppressing
anatomical photographs of
genitals
is in fact in the "public good"? I guess
LittleDan -- who else?
I don't - although if their inclusion results in W
being banned from
schools etc then it becomes debatable as to whether
inclusion is in
Wikipedia's best interests.
That's exactly what I mean. Just imagine if AOL's
filters decided to block wikipedia? Wouldn't it be in
the "public good" to not have wikipedia blocked? I
know what you're going to say: "So we should listen to
the filters?" I'm going to be a realist: Yes.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com