Nobody's suggesting the drawings should be
bowdlerised. They all *should* be more detailed, and
most (if not all) drawings illustrating disease are
more detailed.
--- Toby Bartels <toby+wikipedia(a)math.ucr.edu> wrote:
What good would that do the 10-year-old interested
in Peyronie disease?
You may not be a prude, but you still equate nudity
with pornography,
so you may as well be one. I want to see pictures
of Peyronie disease,
not bowlderised drawings (detailed drawings that aid
understanding are OK),
nor irrelevant "juicy" porn just to demonstrate that
you're not a prude.
-- Toby
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.
http://search.yahoo.com