Hmm...
Maybe we can flag certain links as containing nudity? Then, the link to
an actual image would not display, nor would the image load if a person
made a setting in their Preferences. Perhaps links to nudity could be
restricted so that they can only be referenced by a certain subdomain,
which schools could (probably) block fairly easily, regardless of a
person's preferences.
That's just an idea off the top of my head, I'm not sure it's any more
feasible than flagging certain articles to contain boilerplate text like
disclaimers.
Christopher Mahan wrote:
--- Daniel Ehrenberg <littledanehren(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
Sorry, I'm just uncomftorble with nudity in
Wikipedia
in general, although drawings are okay.
I too am not too keen on nudity.
I feel that an encyclopedia ofour caliber can really positively
impact the lives and education of younger people. By which I mean
anyone who can read and click a mouse (I don't know how old that is,
but my guess is around 4 years old)
I would want to be able to send a 10 year old inquisitive mind to the
W without any reservation.
Besides, if someone wants to see adult nudity, I can give them a few
"juicy" links ;)
Just to demonstrate I'm not prude or anything.