On 5/13/03 12:48 AM, "Daniel Mayer" <maveric149(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Erik wrote:
Since everybody is nominating new sysops, I'd
like to
nominate James Duffy (Jtdirl), who is one of the most
dedicated Wikipedians around. He has made tremendous
contributions to dozens of articles, and I'm sure he would use
these privileges responsibly.
He also likes attacking people, takes things
personally, and doesn't handle
disagreement gracefully.
I'm sure he would use these privileges responsibly.
1. The Cunctator turned up at the end, ignored all that had been said and
all that has been agreed and demands his is best.
2. I will ignore the arrogant and illinformed misrepresentation of political
theory and science. As someone knowledgeable in the area you know the facts.
The Cunctator patently obviously doesn't. --Jtdirl
From Talk:Communist state May 11, 2003
Re The
Cunctator: on a talk page tonight he let slip his real reason for his
behaviour. It isn't this page at all. He refuses to accept the manner in
which political scientists analyse questions. With monumental arrogance, he
believes that his way of throw everything into one article, no matter how
many problems he causes, is superior to the way used by academics, political
scientists, researchers, historians and people who do this sort of analysis
for a living. His edits here are simply part of pushing an agenda. The fact
that this page is organised in the standard manner of international research
bugs him, because our infallible all knowing Cunctator knows that everyone
else's way is wrong, the way by which one rights up research is all wrong,
because he knows best. The fact that he has a poor grasp of the facts and a
monumental ignorance of how academic research is done don't bug him because
he knows best and the entire academic world is going to have to do things
his 'superior' way. Jtdirl 02:48 May 11, 2003