Red Hill Technology wrote:
Readers misunderstand political economist's
technical expressions
(words like those listed above) - which is a good deal worse.
I think that everywhere you have written "political economist" you
should have written "Marxist". The field of political economy is not
primarily Marxist, and does not use Marxist jargon for the most part.
In summary, yes, 172 creates difficulties. But he also
makes a very
useful contribution to Wikipedia, and is not impossible to work
with. He has moderated his initial anti-cooperative behaviour, and
(I suspect) will learn to moderate it further as time goes by (not
least in consequence of this present controversy).
Well, I suppose we can wait and see.