--- Eric Demolli <demolli(a)unice.fr> wrote:
But the article can expose non-consensual opinions
in a balanced way....
The consensus should researched about NPOV not
about the subject of the
article.
Exactly my point, but I argue further that writing the
complete or partial larry text INSIDE the article is
an obvious and very strong POV issue. Why give 400
lines (or in fact, any amount of space) for an obscure
philosopher but leave all others overlooked? this is
an obvious bias.
I will sum my personal opinion about larry's texts and
similar writings: I think they should be completely
removed from the encyclopedia and transferred,
possibly to an "Ideapedia" that specializes in
collaborative scientific and philosophical research.
Rotem
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com