<br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 3/11/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Christophe Henner</b> <<a href="mailto:christophe.henner@gmail.com">christophe.henner@gmail.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>As you can read on the very first lign of this section meta. is enough<br>for translations :)</blockquote><div><br>You are the one talking about a "translation wiki".<br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
What I'm speaking about is wider. Actually we have big communities,<br>but what about a core Community. Are we enough volounteer? No we're<br>not. Is it easy for volounteers to get involved? Not at all. What I'm
<br>speaking about is linking the communities.<br><br>This part is the long term part of the meeting. It's not something to<br>do tommorrow but something we have to begin to set up.<br><br>This part was "start reflexion", and I will continue to push it
<br>forward with the recruitment of the volounteer coordinator. We need<br>more internal communication, and meta. is not right for this, it will<br>be easier to have a main community wiki and then guide them where they<br>
can help.</blockquote><div><br>Could you just explain *once* *why* meta is not "right for this"? Meta is our central coordination wiki. Linking the communities is one of its goals. If meta fails in that, improve it, it is a wiki.
<br><br></div></div>-- <br>Guillaume Paumier<br>[[m:User:guillom]]<br><a href="http://www.wikimedia.org">http://www.wikimedia.org</a>