On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 05:46:14PM -0700, Daniel Mayer wrote:
Wouter Vanden Hove wrote:
...
I also would like to point out the recent Debian
decision to consider the GFDL as a non-free license.
This has been debated for months on debian-legal. You
Side note: They only consider GFDLd text to be
"non-free" when "Invariant Sections", "Cover Texts",
"Acknowledgements", and/or "Dedications" (all GFDL
options) are used. We don't use any of those so our
text is free content.
That's right wrt Debian. Now that's a real shame that
GFDL has such options at all - they're all plain non-free.