[QA] How make to make your (stable) browser tests voting

Jon Robson jrobson at wikimedia.org
Mon Jul 20 22:53:40 UTC 2015


Thanks Dan! I started poking around it and it seems the use of user
factory may be an issue for some of MobileFrontend's tests and thus
other projects.
https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T106343#1465574

Glad to be a guinea pig and will continue to push this to the max :)


On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 12:35 AM, Željko Filipin <zfilipin at wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Amazing. Thanks Dan and everybody else that made this happen.
>
> Željko
>
> On Sat, Jul 11, 2015 at 1:29 AM, Dan Duvall <dduvall at wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>
>> Standing on the successes of Barry, the browser-test bot that Reading has
>> been using recently to test Gerrit patches before merging them, we've taken
>> the next logical step and implemented a JJB builder/template that can do the
>> same but is fully integrated into the Gerrit/Zuul pipeline(s). I've been
>> working out some of the kinks in it this week, and I think it's finally
>> working well enough for general use.
>>
>> Big thanks to Legoktm and Krinkle for helping to refactor/generalize the
>> support builders/templates/scripts that were currently being used to support
>> QUnit tests, and to Jon Robson and the Reading team for setting up Barry,
>> proving that a well curated set of end-to-end tests can be stable enough for
>> this purpose.
>>
>> See here for details on how to try it out!
>> https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Continuous_integration/Browser_tests
>>
>> --
>> Dan Duvall
>> Automation Engineer
>> Wikimedia Foundation
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> QA mailing list
>> QA at lists.wikimedia.org
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> QA mailing list
> QA at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
>



More information about the QA mailing list