[QA] run browser tests against production Wikipedia?

Rachel Thomas rachelqa99 at gmail.com
Thu Sep 19 20:21:03 UTC 2013


>From Zeljko's gerrit code, it looks like he already removed the production
tests.   I was going to say that it could be still valuable to run them.
There may be a time when test2 is not updated correctly with the right
versions of features that we want to test, or is down for maintenance, and
it would be a good idea to have a backup test running on production
server.    Also, those tests do not seem to be ones that would take a lot
of time or horsepower to run, so it wouldn't be much overhead to run those.

--Rachel

*Gnome FOSS Outreach Program for Women Intern
Browser Test Automation, Wikimedia Foundation*

Notes from the Bleeding Edge <http://www.bleededge.blogspot.com/>



On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Željko Filipin <zfilipin at wikimedia.org>wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Chris McMahon <cmcmahon at wikimedia.org>wrote:
>
>> Open question:  is it worthwhile to run read-only browser tests against
>> the production wiki, e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org?
>>
>
> I did some cleanup on how tests run. Feel free to comment here or in
> Gerrit:
>
> https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/r/#/c/85098/
>
> Željko
>
> _______________________________________________
> QA mailing list
> QA at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/qa/attachments/20130919/b45b4275/attachment.html>


More information about the QA mailing list