[QA] QA/testing documentation

Vernon Richards vernon at virtesting.com
Mon Dec 2 16:24:28 UTC 2013


Is there a page that explains what the difference is from a Wikimedia perspective?

*heads over to the pages to investigate…*

On 2 Dec 2013, at 16:19, Chris McMahon wrote:

> 
> I would prefer to keep both the QA category and the Testing category.   I am sure there is overlap between them, but I think that is a good thing.  
> 
> In fact, the more Categories attached the software testing/QA pages, the easier they will be to identify. 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Željko Filipin <zfilipin at wikimedia.org> wrote:
> Hi QA and/or testing people,
> 
> since more and more people that are completely new to testing and/or mediawiki are joining us, I would like to make sure our documentation is as good as possible.
> 
> The first step was to find the documentation that we already have.
> 
> I have found Category:QA[1] (55 pages) and Category:Testing[2] (37 pages). Is there a reason we have to categories that are so closely related? If there is no good reason I propose that we merge them (and delete one category). I prefer term testing, but looks like QA is more popular (and shorter) so we can pick QA.
> 
> So, if nobody complains in a few days, I will delete testing category and add articles that were there to QA category.
> 
> Željko
> --
> 1: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Category:QA
> 2: https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Category:Testing
> 
> _______________________________________________
> QA mailing list
> QA at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> QA mailing list
> QA at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/qa

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/qa/attachments/20131202/3f8c35a0/attachment.html>


More information about the QA mailing list