[Pywikipedia-l] Why not Python 3?

[Dr. Trigon]

I think the question here is:
* how mature is py3?
* how many experiences do we have with it?

greetings


Am 06.10.2010 17:57, schrieb Bináris:
> Hi!
>
> It is obvious, that we will have to let Python 2.x to go one day. Now
> the developers have been working on Pywikipedia 2 for a long time, and
> are looking forward to release it. But what then? How long will itt work?
>
> In the past weeks I was dealing with Python very much, and I have ideas
> on 2 vs. 3. I tried to guess the reason not to use Python 3. As far as I
> see, the main problem is with the big quantity of u"..."s. But I they
> can probably be converted py the 2to3 module. So what is the main reason
> to keep 2.x?
>
> --
> Bináris
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pywikipedia-l mailing list
> Pywikipedia-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/pywikipedia-l