Hoi,<br>There are three places where you are heard; this mailing list, the [[Support]] page at <a href="http://translatewiki.net">translatewiki.net</a> and, the IRC channel at <a id="ch-url-anchor" class="chatzilla-link" href="irc://freenode/mediawiki-i18n">irc://freenode/mediawiki-i18n</a> .<br>
<br>The first thing is that we REALLY want to know when it is not good. The next part is to define what is good and find documentation that proves it. Finally we will create an entry in the reporting system of Unicode for the CLDR. NB No definition is not good either ... even when everything is standard because how do we know ?<br>
Thanks,<br> Gerard<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:27 AM, Federico Leva (Nemo) <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:nemowiki@gmail.com">nemowiki@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Gerard Meijssen, 17/01/2012 08:35:<br>
<div class="im">> When the information for a language is correct, there is nothing to be<br>
> done for PLURAL. As I understand it, you are right when you state that<br>
> the plural-gettext.txt is where the information can be found. In essence<br>
> it means for me that in addition to a potential difference with the CLDR<br>
> there may be a difference with the implementation in gettext as well. As<br>
> you may know, gettext is used inthe implementation of many freely<br>
> license applications.<br>
<br>
</div>Thank you. And what do we need to do when it isn't correct?<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
Nemo<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Mediawiki-i18n mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Mediawiki-i18n@lists.wikimedia.org">Mediawiki-i18n@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-i18n" target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/mediawiki-i18n</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>