<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 03:38, Platonides <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:platonides@gmail.com" target="_blank">platonides@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div>On 14/12/11 22:33, Srikanth Lakshmanan wrote:<br>
> Language support teams :- <br>
<br>
</div>In order to force them, "if you don't test this it may break horribly<br>
for you when deployed" seems way more convincing than "no new goodies<br>
for you".<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>We tried telling people to test saying the same thing, may be should try telling them more often.</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Development must continue even if ignored (do not confuse with negative<br>
feedback), but blind coding without feedback is a dangerous zone.<br></blockquote><div>+1</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div>
> PS: I understand the criticism might have come hard on the India list,<br>
> but we(critics) are getting used to a pattern beyond Webfonts. We alert<br>
> of something dangerous on the cards, People(mostly WMF) tend to ignore<br>
> us, Then they "firefight" and then we criticize more post the entire<br>
> thing, "you would have been better had you to listened us". This has<br>
> happened 3rd time on row now, other 2 being Protest against Jimbo at<br>
> WikiConference India & IEP. I hope sooner, people take us seriously.<br>
<br>
</div>It's not that Indian sites are treated worse, see the recent (similar)<br>
issues in commons with EXIF.<br>
</blockquote></div><br>Sorry I didn't quite get you, not sure if you got what i meant as well. I never said / meant / implied "Indian sites are treated worse", what I tried to convey was why the criticism on India list is high. <br clear="all">
<div><br></div>-- <br>Regards<br>Srikanth.L<br>