<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;"><br>
The "Licensing update" page is short on motivations. I think it needs a<br>
strong early statement about why we're going to all this bother. </blockquote><div><br>I agree. Even the FAQ's first section and the vote header contain better motivations.<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
It's not clear to me whether the text should have a neutral point of<br>
view on whether to change the license, or whether it should advocate<br>
for the change. The Trustees clearly desired change of some sort,<br>
and this change is what has been worked out so far. </blockquote><div><br>Since "as a group the committee is officially neutral" we should either have neutral pages or pages which contain reasons for and against the change; but as there might be nobody opposing the change who will give arguments, the pages could only include pro-changing statements (like the FAQ does yet).<br>
</div><div><br> </div></div><br>