[Labs-l] Removing memcache from tools

Petr Bena benapetr at gmail.com
Wed Jul 17 11:55:06 UTC 2013


what about software that doesn't support redis? Like the bots that are
currently using memcache. What is actually a reason to remove it? Does
it eat too many resources or what?

While using the sharp memcache seems too complicated to you, what's
wrong on patched original memcache? given that it has like 1 release
in 2 years it doesn't sound to me like something hard to maintain...

I see some of your points, but this seems to me like "make life of
sysadmin easier" vs "make life of programmer (tool maintainer) far
harder"

do we really need to make "our life" easier by making it harder for devs?

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Marc A. Pelletier <marc at uberbox.org> wrote:
> On 07/16/2013 05:19 PM, Ryan Lane wrote:
>> Unless there's good strong objections I plan on doing this one month now.
>
> Emphasis on /good/.  None from me, obviously.
>
> -- Marc
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Labs-l mailing list
> Labs-l at lists.wikimedia.org
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/labs-l



More information about the Labs-l mailing list