<div dir="ltr"><div><div><div><div>What a lovely and thoughtful essay, Sylvia.<br><br></div>For my part, I see a significant difference between sharing information with people I choose to share information with, and posting my personal details on a publicly accessible, top-10 website, where the people most likely to abuse that information don't even need to log in to see it, and where there are no privacy control options.<br>
<br></div>I have always gone to significant trouble to keep my personal information to myself. I don't "do" facebook, or twitter, or google+. Several of my family members (who share my rather obscure surname) have been subjected to telephone calls, facebook and twitter messages intended to harass *me*. I do not participate in media interviews or any surveys where my personal information would be included. I don't participate on websites where I know personal information of wikipedians is exchanged, and in fact rarely access them and then only with an anonymizing proxy. For all intents and purposes, I only participate regularly on one non-WMF website/forum....and sure enough, at one point someone tracked down my account there and manipulated other forum members to provide information about me, which was later used to try to blackmail me in my role as an English Wikipedia arbitrator. <br>
<br></div>Those worries are real, and these events do happen; however, much of it relates to how "high profile" someone is. One of the biggest downsides in being amongst the small number of self-identifying women on WMF sites is the fact that we become higher profile simply because of our rarity. The overwhelming majority of Wikimedians are never bothered in these ways; I'd suggest that it's probably less than 1% of us who have been so aggressively dealt with. But when it happens, and especially if it's out of the blue, it is an horrendous experience. <br>
<br></div>Risker/Anne<br><div><div><br><br><br><br></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 9 May 2013 14:58, Sylvia Ventura <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:sylvia.ventura@gmail.com" target="_blank">sylvia.ventura@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<p class="MsoNormal">I command Sarah, Sarah, Anne and few other women and men commenting on
this list for their tireless work trying to move the needle. I wish I had seen more movement/women coming
forward and stepping up – but I would not be surprised if many of us were…. uncomfortable. I know I
am. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">or simply burned out … which seems to be the case. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I had to think long and hard about writing this. Sarah, once again is trying to be constructive by creating momentum and a page <a href="https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Gender_gap/Policy_revolution" target="_blank">https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Gender_gap/Policy_revolution</a> to capture and focus conversations. I think it's a great initiative but I also think the problem we're dealing with is more systemic and might need a tougher conversation. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br></p><p class="MsoNormal">How can we 'speak openly' in a forum like "Policy Revolution" when a few of
us are playing a different game – most folks here use their real
identities, take their contribution work at heart, we know who we are. But then we have the Ghosts, those hiding behind the cloak of “Privacy” (perverse effect of a well-meant
policy I am sure) while trolling, harassing, messing with images/content with impunity. If we are serious about creating a broader more sustainable more representative participation to the projects the WMF folks (those with some level of mandate) need to seriously revise the community’s rules of engagement and stand behind it. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal">A have been sitting on this note (below) for a while, I
understand the need for privacy in the context of political/individual/speech freedom and to insure personal safety in some cases. This group is composed of some of the
smartest people on the planet, we surely can come up with some mechanism to protect
those who need protection (anonymity) while creating a healthy, open, constructive, environment. </p><p class="MsoNormal"></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial">== </span><span style="font-family:Arial;font-size:13.63636302947998px">NB: this was written shortly after Hersfold resignation, focuses on harassment but its relevant to all questionable behavior.==</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;font-size:13.63636302947998px"><br></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial">Accidental troll
policy</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial">My ID was recently
deleted on Meta-Wiki, the reason given was: wait for it… Vandalism. Little than
I knew I had breached protocol – as a newbie I had created a page on
Meta and had clearly broken the rules. Or was it, since then, I learned
that your individual history (been banned/suspended, etc…) determines your
capacity of progressing in the ranks of WP – so this might have been purely
accidental or not. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial">But back to
my point, after being notified of my ban, as a good citizen and a steward of open-culture
I felt it was my duty to get educated. I checked the Wikipedia’s user policy. What
I found was lengthy, detailed but overall clear. Except for a portion that was particularly unsettling.
The one about “Use of Real Name and Harassment”. [[excerpt: </span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;background-repeat:initial initial">use of real name may make a contributor more
vulnerable to issues such as </span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Harassment" title="Wikipedia:Harassment" target="_blank"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#0b0080;background:white;text-decoration:none">harassment</span></a><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;background-repeat:initial initial">, both on and off Wikipedia]]</span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial">After
reading the posting about the Resignation of </span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial;background-repeat:initial initial">arbitrator </span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hersfold" title="User:Hersfold" target="_blank"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#0b0080;background:white;text-decoration:none">Hersfold</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial"> in yesterday’s Signpost I can’t let
go of the idea that the policy might actually enable the very problem it is
trying to avoid <harassment> by perpetuating the culture of obscurity and
by allowing trolls to hide behind anonymity. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial">In an era
where information is a commodity, where online traceability is child’s play for
anyone with rudimentary tech skills I can’t imagine that concealing one’s real-life
identity on Wikipedia will minimize the incidence of harassment. </span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial">The
reasons for </span><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hersfold" title="User:Hersfold" target="_blank"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial;color:#0b0080;background:white;text-decoration:none">Hersfold</span></a><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial">
resignation again</span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial"> shed
a gloomy light on this. Granted, arbitration is a “hot seat” to hold but unless
we are willing to put in place a “witness protection program” style for
wikipedians involved in conflict resolution, it will be impossible to prevent
this from happening again.</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial">So the
question I’m thorn with is who’s really benefiting from the “Privacy - no
Real name Policy”? The folks trying to do their job sensibly and seeking some
distance between their work on Wikipedia and their personal lives/families/jobs
or the trolls that haven’t yet found that clear boundary and are, by design, allowed
to create a toxic and unwelcoming environment. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial">Looking at
it from the other end. What if the system promoted total transparency? Where</span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial">
</span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial">everyone in it is
really who they say they are. A system where real-life ID is tied to the online
work, no place to hide, where the very act of signing up and becoming a
wikipedian is a pledge for civility, respect and trust. Where personal status
is a currency based on both hard and soft skills, (number/quality of
contributions and the manner in which we interact with each other). Maybe you get
to play anonymously for a while but if you want to get serious and become a ‘ranked’
wikipedian tell us who you are.</span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;font-size:10pt"><br></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:Arial;font-size:10pt">I honestly
don’t know how much implementation of a formal vetting system would violate the
foundation’s DNA – and it might - but knowing what mechanisms/policies
facilitate harassment will help us find solutions to prevent it from
perpetuating. In this case ‘anonymity’ could
be a weak link. </span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial"><br></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial">How about associating a Wikipedia
ID to a mobile phone number at sign up, send the access code and instructions to
new users before they get started – </span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial">à la </span><span style="font-size:10pt;font-family:Arial">craigslist. If this is not acceptable
let’s find another way to tie in real-life ID with Wikipedia’s ID and keep the
community healthy, truly open and safe. Who do we risk losing by getting to
know who we are? The trolls – yes. because
there will be no place to hide and play big bad wolf. Who do we attract? Potentially
everyone that has once considered contributing to Wikipedia but found it to be unsafe
and off-putting. </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial"><br></span></p><p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial">Some might
argue: “look, this is not a social club, this is how we’ve always done it, grow
a skin or move along”. I’d say: totally agree, institutional
knowledge is important, let’s keep the good </span><span style="font-family:Arial;font-size:13.63636302947998px">- and there is plenty - </span><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial"> and shed the bad. Wikipedia
has evolved greatly in the past 10 years and so has the world, and general expectations for social interactions have changed. We are steadily
losing some and still missing many voices on Wikipedia. Clearly harassment is not
the chief cause, but since *people* are the most important part (asset) of Wikipedia,
we need to start developing a much-needed social protocol and insure the free flow
of knowledge over ethos. </span></p><span class="HOEnZb"><font color="#888888">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:Arial"> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Sylvia</p>
</font></span><br>_______________________________________________<br>
Gendergap mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org">Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap" target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>