<div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Ole Palnatoke Andersen <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:palnatoke@gmail.com">palnatoke@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;padding-left:1ex;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-width:1px;border-left-style:solid" class="gmail_quote">
On Sun, Dec 25, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Sarah Stierch <<a href="mailto:sarah.stierch@gmail.com">sarah.stierch@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
...<br>
> It's a shame that my posts have been so bothersome for the list, I never<br>
> knew that I was only making things worse, or not helping at all.<br>
<br>
I, for one, do not find your posts bothersome.<br>
I find no problem with having one gender-neutral article for barbers<br>
and hairdressers or for pimps and madams, but I do find it better to<br>
have *two* good articles on the respective subjects.<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br>I agree. The point of Wikipedia/Wikimedia as a whole is to have high-quality articles, and any way we can do that, and do something about the gender bias in both projects, the better. I also understand Sarah's defenseness. It seems that content editors get the short end of the stick, to the point that many good editors leave. Keep up the good work, Sarah.<br clear="all">
<br>Christine<br>User:Figureskatingfan<br>