<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1" http-equiv=Content-Type>
<META name=GENERATOR content="MSHTML 8.00.6001.19120">
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT><BR>I love the idea of having articles of
gender concern in a one stop shopping space. Going through the NPOV collection
is long, painful and is filled with lots of advertising articles for tech
companies. Blarghhhh<BR><BR>-Sarah<BR></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial> I agree with a gender-specific tag
as well. NPOV is (by design) vague and, to me, not quite the fit we need as it
is best applied to allegedly non-neutral use of language (in obvious cases of
POV language, I just fix it ... there's no need to discuss). We ourselves
already have {{globalize}}</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial><A
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Globalize">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Globalize</A></FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>for the situation of articles reflecting only the
experience of one particular region of the world or country. I don't see why
gender bias couldn't be addressed the same way.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=2 face=Arial>Daniel Case</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML>