<html><body bgcolor="#FFFFFF"><div>Anyone know a medical doctor/gyno who can perhaps provide some type of documentation/review of the content?</div><div><br></div><div>Not sure if it would ever matter...but, a solid letter and such could help maybe..</div><div><br></div><div>I haven't looked at the article, I admit, it's a subject I'm not comfortable "examining" </div><div><br></div><div>Another example of why medical support could be beneficial to Wikipedia as a whole. </div><div><br></div><div>Sarah (Stierch)</div><div><br></div><div><br><div>Sent via iPhone - I apologize in advance for my shortness or errors! :)</div><div><br></div></div><div><br>On Sep 17, 2011, at 10:51 PM, The Richardsons <<a href="mailto:donsav2@optonline.net">donsav2@optonline.net</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><div></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
On 9/17/2011 3:00 PM, <br>
<pre wrap="">Sarah Stierch</pre>
wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:mailman.28055.1316286054.12057.gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">The choices are really mediocre for the "neckline" women's section. One of
the photos is titled "Boobies.jpg."</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
I saw that “boobies.jpg” was changed to “Cleavage (breasts).jpg”
about four hours ago by Mattbuck. +1 for Gendergap!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br>
That was the good news <br>
The bad news is that, from earlier posts about labiaplasty, it
seemed that users wanted to remove the picture from the page, but
that others put it back up. What I believe is that you had no right
to take the picture off without consensus. Please excuse me if I
missed something that would prove that there was consensus
otherwise. Again, though, what troubles me is that SlimVirgin did
get talked to rudely, being mockingly (in my opinion) called an
“Administratrix” and being told to “play by the rules you claim to
enforce”. Also, you seem to be right in saying that the picture
isn’t a “hypertrophy” (although I wouldn’t know) and I am pleased to
see that a note was added early this morning UTC. <br>
<br>
But my main problem is how we get to reach a consensus on this,
by, which we certainly can, by questioning its “licensed medical
image” status, pointing out that it is two different people, and
pointing out that the labia minora are not hypertrophies.<br>
<br>
--- RDW2210<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0,
0); font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 13px; font-style: normal;
font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal;
line-height: 19px; orphans: 2; text-align: -webkit-auto;
text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal;
widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-decorations-in-effect:
none; -webkit-text-size-adjust: auto; -webkit-text-stroke-width:
0px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255); "></span>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>Gendergap mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org">Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org</a></span><br><span><a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>