<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 10:31 PM, Laura Hale <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:laura@fanhistory.com">laura@fanhistory.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Philippe Beaudette <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:philippe@wikimedia.org" target="_blank">philippe@wikimedia.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
That's a great start!<div><br></div><div>One thing I'd do... our "acronym soup" can be enormously confusing. I have a tendency to write " <a href="http://enwp.org/WP:BLP" target="_blank">enwp.org/WP:BLP</a> ", for instance, but an outsider might need to see <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_Living_Persons" target="_blank">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_Living_Persons</a> - it's easier for the mind to parse.</div>
<div><br></div><br></blockquote></div><br></div>I shortened the URLs mostly because this was intended as a print resource. The fewer the letters, the less likely people are to get frustrated with typing. :)<div><div></div>
<div class="h5"><br><br></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Right, I understand but disagree. :-) I think it's easier for the mind to parse full words that are long rather than short series of random (to them) letters. :)</div>
<div><br></div><div>pb </div></div>