<div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Sarah <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:slimvirgin@gmail.com">slimvirgin@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<div class="im">On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 19:27, <<a href="mailto:carolmooredc@verizon.net">carolmooredc@verizon.net</a>> wrote:<br>
> Lots of us old hippie women are exhibitionists and I could advertise and<br>
> get a few of us to pose. Then the young guys would have to discuss<br>
> whether the 19 year old or 60 year old breast/nude/buttock etc. is more<br>
> appropriate for an article.<br>
><br>
> Hope that also engenders a good laugh....<br>
><br>
> Carol in dc<br>
><br>
</div>It's actually a serious point, though. It would be great to provide<br>
images for those articles that don't portray women the way certain men<br>
want to see them portrayed. I recall the Body Shop did that a couple<br>
of decades ago -- started using images of women that fell outside the<br>
usual range that tended to be objectified (older, not thin, etc). They<br>
produced some very good ads as a result. The difficulty for us would<br>
be in finding those images, then in maintaining them on the pages.<br></blockquote><div> <br></div></div>Yes, I remember this, too. <br><br>Sydney<br>