<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman,new york,times,serif;font-size:10pt"><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><br></div><div style="font-family: times new roman,new york,times,serif; font-size: 10pt;"><div style="margin-left: 40px;"><br><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><hr size="1"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">From:</span></b> James Salsman <jsalsman@gmail.com></font><br><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">To:</span></b> gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org</font><br><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Sent:</span></b> Thu, February 24, 2011 4:13:47 PM</font><br><font face="Tahoma" size="2"><b><span style="font-weight: bold;">Subject:</span></b> [Gendergap] the terms "chicks" and "fellows"; systemic bias noticeboard</font><br><br><br>It seems to me that the English Wikipedia would be far better with a<br>systematic
bias noticeboard to cover both gender and geographic<br>concerns.<br></div><div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;">
<br>Honestly it would depend on the traffic levels. But it is a reasonable suggestion to start one more general notice board first and refine into several more detailed noticeboards when it becomes cumbersome.<br><br>Birgitte SB<br></div></div>
</div><br>
</body></html>