Can you give an example of what you are considering when you want to give a sexually explicit image preference out of necessity.<br><br>For example if the only image uploaded of a United States State Park was a nude female laying on a blanket in tent and masturbating in the the state park, would you say that it should be included so we have an image of the State Park?<br>
<br>Sydney<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Oliver Keyes <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:scire.facias@gmail.com">scire.facias@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
I think that's too strict in some ways; it depends. If we're talking about commons, certainly. If we're talking about wikipedia, I'd prefer a necessity test. In other words, would a non-sexual image do a worse job at illustrating the article? If so, include a sexual image. If not, don't.<br>
<br><div class="gmail_quote"><div><div></div><div class="h5">On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Andreas Kolbe <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:jayen466@yahoo.com" target="_blank">jayen466@yahoo.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
</div></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div><div></div><div class="h5">
<table border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"><tbody><tr><td style="font: inherit;" valign="top"><div><font face="arial" size="2">--- On </font><b style="font-family: arial; font-size: 10pt;">Thu, 17/2/11, Ryan Kaldari <i><<a href="mailto:rkaldari@wikimedia.org" target="_blank">rkaldari@wikimedia.org</a>></i></b><font face="arial" size="2"> wrote:</font><br>
<blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px; font-family: arial; font-size: 10pt;"></blockquote><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px; font-family: arial; font-size: 10pt;">
<div>Yep, try
<a rel="nofollow" href="http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:People_using_vacuum_cleaners" target="_blank">http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:People_using_vacuum_cleaners</a><br>
<br>
So do we all agree that the Principle of Least Astonishment needs to be
encoded into some kind of policy or guideline? In other words, images
with a sexual context should only appear in articles/categories that
also have a sexual context. Otherwise, Wikipedia naturally tends
towards an editorial policy dictated by 20-year-old single white males
who see no problem with keeping pictures of naked women in every corner
of Wikipedia and Commons.<br></div></blockquote></div><font face="arial" size="2"><br> <br><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;"><font face="arial" size="2">Yes.</font></span><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;"><br>
</span></font><div><font face="arial" size="2"><span style="font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-size: medium;"><font face="arial" size="2"><br></font></span></font></div></td></tr></tbody></table><br>
<br></div></div><div class="im">_______________________________________________<br>
Gendergap mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org" target="_blank">Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap" target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap</a><br>
<br></div></blockquote></div><br>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Gendergap mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org">Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap" target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>