Yes, this. Oliver's done a better job phrasing what I wanted to communicate. The necessity test is really what needs to be in play.<br><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 3:41 PM, Oliver Keyes <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:scire.facias@gmail.com">scire.facias@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">I think that's too strict in some ways; it depends. If we're talking about commons, certainly. If we're talking about wikipedia, I'd prefer a necessity test. In other words, would a non-sexual image do a worse job at illustrating the article? If so, include a sexual image. If not, don't.<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Gendergap mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org">Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap" target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>