How about you all contribute to the discussion proper, rather than suggesting things which, if made on-wiki, would result in an immediate block for inappropriate behaviour?<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Joseph Reagle <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:joseph.2008@reagle.org">joseph.2008@reagle.org</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">On Tuesday, February 15, 2011, Andreas Kolbe wrote:<br>
> There are some excruciatingly naive arguments being made on the essay's<br>
> talk page, e.g.:<br>
<br>
Is this the sort of thing that would benefit from public pillory? For example, a posting on Geek Feminism blog or elsewhere? On one hand, I think such attitudes merit public critique, on the other, I wouldn't want such efforts to backfire and make Wikipedia even less appealing to possible contributors, particularly if this is just a rat hole.<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Gendergap mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org">Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap" target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br>