<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">So it sounds like everyone is in favor of setting some kind of clear(er) standard for discussion here. As far as those standards go... <div><br></div><div>
Does everyone feel good about the mailing list code of conduct on Meta? If you think it's missing something key or includes something unnecessary, please edit it. <div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Gender_gap#Discuss">http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Gender_gap#Discuss</a> </div>
<div><br></div><div><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">If that's something we can get consensus on, then it's a tool we can use for pointing out when a conversation has gone haywire. </div>
<div><br></div>On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 2:36 PM, SlimVirgin <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:slimvirgin@gmail.com">slimvirgin@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
I wouldn't mind seeing more moderation.</blockquote></div><br>-- <br>Steven Walling<div>Fellow at Wikimedia Foundation</div><div><a href="http://wikimediafoundation.org" target="_blank">wikimediafoundation.org</a></div>
<br>
</div></div>