That sounds pretty difficult; I imagine a better approach would be either a one-off, or to have them every year or 6 months to see if there's a noticeable shift over time.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Samuel Klein <span dir="ltr"><<a href="http://meta.sj">meta.sj</a>@<a href="http://gmail.com">gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;"><div class="im">On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Oliver Keyes <<a href="mailto:scire.facias@gmail.com">scire.facias@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Is there any chance Howie or someone could run a similar survey, possibly<br>
> with a smaller number surveyed, including a gender entry? This would allow<br>
> us to see if the reasons differ significantly between men and women. Not<br>
> only that, but the response might provide a clearer indication of the actual<br>
> demographics of the community, showing what people are willing to identify<br>
> as in an anonymous, private survey rather than the open domain of Wikipedia<br>
<br>
</div>+1<br>
could this be on ongoing survey, run in a way to target a low<br>
randomized % of visitors continuously over time?<br>
<div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Gendergap mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org">Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org</a><br>
<a href="https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap" target="_blank">https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>