<br><br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 3 February 2011 16:57, Nepenthe <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:topazbutterfly@gmail.com">topazbutterfly@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="PADDING-LEFT: 1ex; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid">I wonder if Wikipe-tan is more of a generational issue than a gender one. I'm pretty much as humorless feminist as they come, but being in my early 20s, I grew up with anime and Wikipe-tan is no more disturbing to me in the Wikipedia context than if we had come up with a Disney-style mascot not wearing pants. (Granted, that OS-tans are pretty universally female is undoubtedly a gender issue and the anime style is a legitimate concern as well, but I think it's part of culture at large, not one that Wikimedia can really address.)<br>
<br>I guess my point is that it might be a wash whether Wikipe-tan drives off more older editors who find her offensive than she attracts younger editors who find her friendly and familiar. It's really a side point though. It never occurred to me that Wikipe-tan might be considered embarrassing or inappropriate and I'm finding this conversation eye-opening. <br>
<font color="#888888"><br>Nepenthe</font>
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="h5"><br> </div></div></blockquote>
<div> </div>
<div>Well, I'm not thrilled about Wikipe-Tan, but the one that I identified specifically ("Gothic Lolita") is particularly troublesome because of the implications of the term "Lolita", which has a definite sexual meaning of the type that Wikipedia probably doesn't want itself associated, even indirectly. And no, I don't think that's age-specific; even young people know that's a loaded term.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Risker/Anne</div>
<div> </div>
<div> </div></div>